14 August 2024

What is the difference between Firebase and Supabase?

Demystifying the difference between Firebase and Supabase, two prominent Backend-as-a-Service platforms, to aid you in making a more informed choice for your project needs.

The cover image of the blog

Firebase vs Supabase: Choosing the Right Back End for Your Project

Choosing the right back-end solution is one of those decisions that can shape your entire development journey. If you're building a modern web or mobile application, you've likely come across both Firebase and Supabase. While they might seem similar at first glance, they take different approaches to solving back-end challenges.

This article will help you understand which solution makes sense for your specific situation, team, and long-term goals.

TL;DR: Quick decision guide

  • Choose Firebase if: You need to ship fast, building real-time features, want robust offline support, already use Google services, or prefer convention over configuration
  • Choose Supabase if: Your team knows SQL, you need complex queries and relationships, you value open-source flexibility, want predictable pricing, or need a clear migration path
  • Cost reality: Firebase can get expensive with scale (especially bandwidth). Supabase offers predictable tiers and self-hosting options
  • Migration difficulty: Moving away from Firebase is hard. Supabase gives you more flexibility because it's built on standard PostgreSQL
  • Best approach: Build a small test project with each to see which fits your team's workflow before committing

Why this choice matters more than you think

When you're excited about building your product, back-end infrastructure is probably not the first thing you want to think about. But here's the thing: the back end you choose today will influence how easily you can add features tomorrow, how much you'll spend as you grow, and whether you'll feel locked into a particular ecosystem down the road.

The Firebase vs Supabase debate isn't just about picking a type of database. It's about choosing a development philosophy that aligns with how your team works and where you want to take your product.

Understanding what each platform is really about

Before comparing the two platforms, it's helpful to understand what drives each one.

Firebase came from Google's acquisition of a real-time data synchronization company. The main goal has always been to help developers get started quickly, particularly for applications that need real-time capabilities. Google built Firebase to work seamlessly with their cloud infrastructure, and it shows. Everything is designed to reduce friction and let you ship fast.

Supabase, on the other hand, emerged as an open-source response to Firebase. The team behind it wanted to give developers the power of Firebase-like features while keeping things open and flexible. Instead of building everything from scratch, they chose PostgreSQL as their foundation and built modern tools around it. This decision shapes everything about how Supabase works.

When Firebase shines

There are situations where Firebase is the better choice, and understanding these can save you from second-guessing yourself later.

If you're building a prototype or MVP and need to validate your idea quickly, Firebase gets you there faster. The setup is straightforward, the documentation is extensive, and you can have authentication and a database running within an hour. For startups trying to find product-market fit, this speed matters.

Real-time applications are where Firebase truly excels. If you're building a chat app, a collaborative tool, or anything that needs live updates across multiple users, Firebase's real-time infrastructure has been battle-tested at scale. The offline support is robust, and conflict resolution happens automatically.

Firebase also makes sense when you're already deep in Google's ecosystem. If you're using Google Cloud Platform, Google Analytics, or other Google services, the integrations are smooth and natural.

Where Supabase pulls ahead

Supabase isn't trying to do exactly what Firebase does. Instead, it brings something different to the table that suits particular projects and teams.

When your application requires complex data relationships, Supabase is the obvious choice. It runs on PostgreSQL, allowing you to use the SQL queries you already know. Joins, transactions, and referential integrity work just as you would expect. You won't have to denormalize your data or deal with database limitations.

For teams that appreciate transparency and control, the open-source nature of Supabase is important. You can see how everything functions, contribute to the project, and if needed, self-host everything. This flexibility gives you the peace of mind that you won't be stuck if things change.

The way Supabase handles authentication and security is particularly smart. Rather than having to learn a proprietary security model, you create PostgreSQL row-level security policies using SQL. If you understand databases, you understand Supabase's security model.

The cost question everyone asks

When comparing Firebase vs Supabase pricing, the answer depends heavily on how you use each platform.

Firebase's pricing starts generously with a solid free tier. For small projects, you might never pay anything. However, as you scale, certain usage patterns can become expensive very quickly. Database reads and writes, function invocations, and bandwidth all add up. The problem is that you might not realize you're entering expensive territory until the bill arrives.

Supabase, on the other hand, offers more predictable pricing with clear tiers. You know what you're getting at each level, so it’s much easier to properly budget. Plus, because Supabase is built on PostgreSQL and is open-source, you have the option to self-host if your usage grows beyond what makes sense on their own managed service.

In reality, neither option is universally cheaper. Firebase can be more economical for certain usage patterns, while Supabase might save you money in others. The key is understanding your application's behavior and growth trajectory.

Migration and long-term flexibility

One aspect that doesn't get discussed enough is what happens when you need to change course.

Moving away from Firebase is genuinely difficult. Your data is in a NoSQL format specific to Firebase, your authentication is tied to Firebase Auth, and your functions depend on Firebase's infrastructure. If you decide to migrate, you essentially have to rebuild large parts of your backend.

Supabase's approach here is quite different. Because everything is built on PostgreSQL, your data is portable. The authentication system uses standard JWT tokens. If you need to move to a different hosting provider or want to bring everything in-house, the path exists.

This doesn't mean you should avoid Firebase out of fear. Many companies run successfully on Firebase for years without any issues. But it's worth considering this factor based on your risk tolerance and long-term vision.

The developer experience reality

Developer experience goes beyond just how easy something is to learn. It's about how productive you can be during your day-to-day.

Firebase has invested heavily in making their SDK and tools feel polished. The Firebase console is intuitive, the documentation includes code samples for most scenarios, and the error messages are usually helpful. For developers who prefer clear conventions and want things to just work, this approach usually feels quite comfortable.

Supabase appeals to developers who want to understand what's happening behind the scenes. The auto-generated API documentation, the built-in SQL editor, and the ability to write raw PostgreSQL queries give you power and visibility. If you've worked with databases before, Supabase will probably feel familiar in a good way.

Making your decision

After working through all these considerations, how do you actually choose?

Team knowledge: Start by honestly assessing your team's strengths. If your developers are comfortable with SQL and relational databases, Supabase lets them leverage that knowledge. If your team prefers higher-level abstractions and wants to focus on front-end work, Firebase removes more back-end complexity.

Data type: Think about your application's data model. If you're building something with straightforward data structures and heavy real-time requirements, Firebase handles this very well. If you're dealing with complex relationships, reporting needs, or detailed queries, Supabase gives you the tools to handle these elegantly.

Vendor lock-in: Consider your company's stance on vendor relationships. Some organizations prefer the backing and reliability that come with Google's resources. Others value the freedom and transparency that open-source solutions provide.

Plans for the future: Look at your growth plans. If you're planning aggressive scaling, model out potential costs on both platforms based on your expected usage patterns. The difference might surprise you either way.

Beyond the comparison: what really matters

At the end of the day, both Firebase and Supabase are excellent tools that power thousands of successful applications. The Supabase Firebase debate often misses an important point: the right choice depends less on which platform is "better" and more on which platform fits your situation.

Firebase has proven itself at massive scale, handling millions of users for countless apps. When you choose Firebase, you're choosing speed, simplicity, and the backing of Google's infrastructure.

Supabase offers a compelling Firebase alternative for teams that value SQL's power, open-source transparency, and the freedom to change course if needed. When you choose Supabase, you're choosing flexibility, control, and a foundation that feels familiar to traditional web developers.

The best way to make this decision is to build something small with each platform. Spend a weekend with Firebase, then spend another weekend with Supabase. See which one feels right for how you and your team work. Notice which approach makes you more productive, which limitations you can live with, and which benefits matter most for your project.

Your back-end choice matters, but it's not permanent and irreversible. Many successful companies have migrated their infrastructure as they've grown and learned what they need. The important thing is choosing the solution that lets you build and ship now, while keeping your eyes open to what you might need down the road.

Learn all about Supabase, Firebase, and more with our comprehensive guide on tools and integrations for modern web development.